Why this file is complex
Self-employed files carry a built-in contradiction: good tax planning minimizes the exact number standard underwriting reads. Add variable income across years, corporate versus personal accounts, add-backs an underwriter may or may not accept, and the gap between economic reality and the application becomes the decline.
What David checks
- The actual decline reason in writing, not the summary the borrower was told
- Salary, dividends, retained earnings and how each documents
- Two-year pattern: growing, stable or declining, and what explains it
- Business bank deposits versus reported revenue
- Whether a co-applicant changes the arithmetic
- Whether the original lender's own guidelines allow a documentation path the first submission did not use
What documents or facts change the answer
A second fiscal year of corporate financials often converts a decline into an approval. An accountant's letter tying the structure together lets an underwriter count what is already there. Documented add-backs, a co-applicant salary, or six more months of deposits can each flip the ratio math.
When a different path may exist
If the mainstream template cannot be satisfied this year, an alternative program can bridge on a one-to-three-year term with a defined exit back to standard pricing once the documentation matures. That is a transition, not a destination.
When waiting or not proceeding may be safer
If the business is younger than about a year, most programs cannot read it yet and the bridge cost buys little. If real cash flow would strain under the payment, an approval is not a favour. Waiting for a year-end, or restructuring how income is taken, is sometimes the professional answer.
Ask David to Review the Scenario
Send the scenario, not sensitive documents: what happened, the numbers, the timeline. Straight answer within a business day, including an honest none of this fits yet when that is the truth.
Send David the ScenarioRelated: How David reviews a declined file · Case files · Declined by your bank